soc.ieu.edu.tr
Course Name | |
Code | Semester | Theory (hour/week) | Application/Lab (hour/week) | Local Credits | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fall/Spring |
Prerequisites | None | |||||
Course Language | ||||||
Course Type | Elective | |||||
Course Level | - | |||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | ||||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | - | |||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | |
Learning Outcomes | The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description |
| Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses | X | |
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Managment Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
Week | Subjects | Required Materials |
1 | Presentation and overview of the course; viewing of and discussion on Un Chien Andalou (Luis Buñuel, 1929) | |
2 | What is art? What is aesthetic experience? | Zolberg, pp. 1 29 |
3 | How does one go from “This is beautiful” to a sociology of the arts (and back again)? | Zolberg, pp. 53 79; Eagleton, pp. 1 16 |
4 | The work of art as social process. Reflection approaches and shaping approaches. | Zolberg, pp. 79 107; Alexander, pp. 21 37 & 41 55 |
5 | Reception approaches and audience studies. | Zolberg, pp. 136 162; Alexander, pp. 181 222 |
6 | Art and social boundaries. | Alexander, pp. 225 244 |
7 | MIDTERM | |
8 | Aesthetic experience and its vicissitudes (1): how to evaluate the evaluations of art. | Bourdieu, RA, pp. 214 274 |
9 | Aesthetic experience and its vicissitudes (2): the social uses of art. | Bourdieu, DJT, pp. 257 318 |
10 | “A strange sensation: controversies in art.” | Alexander, pp. 278 305 |
11 | The function of the artist. | Zolberg, pp. 107 136; Alexander, pp. 131 152 |
12 | Ways of seeing (1): the social space of perception. | Alexander, pp. 251 278; Sontag, OP, pp. 3 85 |
13 | Wk 12 cont’d. | Sontag, pp. 85 183; Berger, WS, pp. 1 34 |
14 | Ways of seeing (2): the political space of perception. | Ranciere, DPA, pp. 115 205 |
15 | Research Paper Submission and Review of the course. | Research paper submission deadline. |
16 | Final | Final |
Course Notes/Textbooks | Zolberg, Vera L., Constructing a Sociology of the Arts, Cambridge University Press (1990); Alexander, Victoria D., Sociology of the Arts: Exploring Fine and Popular Forms, WileyBlackwell (2003); Eagleton, Terry, Literary Theory: An Introduction, University of Minnesota Press (2008); Sontag, Susan, On Photography, Picador (2001) Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Harvard University Press (1987), The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Stanford University Press (1996) John Berger, Ways of Seeing, Penguin (1990) |
Suggested Readings/Materials | Lectures will incorporate audio and visual material which will serve as starting points for class discussions |
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation | 1 | 10 |
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | - | - |
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments | 4 | 20 |
Presentation / Jury | 1 | 20 |
Project | 1 | 25 |
Seminar / Workshop | ||
Oral Exam | ||
Midterm | 1 | 25 |
Final Exam | - | - |
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 75 | |
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 25 | |
Total |
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | ||
Study Hours Out of Class | 16 | 4 | |
Field Work | |||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | |||
Portfolio | |||
Homework / Assignments | 4 | 1 | |
Presentation / Jury | |||
Project | 1 | 9 | |
Seminar / Workshop | |||
Oral Exam | |||
Midterms | 1 | 10 | |
Final Exams | - | 10 | |
Total | 135 |
# | Program Competencies/Outcomes | * Contribution Level | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | To be able to scientifically examine concepts and ideas in the field of sociology; to be able to interpret and evaluate data. | X | ||||
2 | To be able to define classical and contemporary theories in sociology; to be able to identify the differences and similarities among those theories and to be able to evaluate them. | X | ||||
3 | To be able to critically use the knowledge acquired in the field of sociology | X | ||||
4 | To be able to plan and conduct, individually or as a member of a team, an entire sociological research process with the knowledge of methodological requirements of the field. | X | ||||
5 | To be able to identify and evaluate local, regional and global issues and problems. | |||||
6 | To be able to share their ideas and solutions supplemented by qualitative and quantitative data in written and oral forms. | X | ||||
7 | To be able to make use of other disciplines related to sociology and to have core knowledge related to those disciplines. | X | ||||
8 | To be able to follow developments in sociology and to be able to communicate with international colleagues in a foreign language. (“European Language Portfolio Global Scale,” Level B1) | X | ||||
9 | To be able to use computer software required by the discipline and to possess advancedlevel computing and IT skills. (“European Computer Driving Licence”, Advanced Level) | X | ||||
10 | To be able to use a second foreign language at the intermediate level. | |||||
11 | To have social and scholarly values and ethical principles during the collection and interpretation of data for implementation, publication, dissemination, and maintenance | X | ||||
12 | To acquire life long learning abilities that will enable the socially responsible application of knowledge based on their field of study to their professional and everyday lives. | X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest